• Users Online: 150
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 43-45

Comparison of bond strength and fracture toughness of metal–ceramic restorations fabricated by conventional lost-wax technique and selective laser sintering


1 Prosthodontics GDC &H Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Prosthodontics GDC &H Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rajneesh Kumar
House no 92, upper ground, block -I,pocket 3, sector 16, rohini, Delhi 110085.
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/INJO.INJO_26_19

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Porcelain fused to metal is the most common restoration. The success of the prosthesis greatly depends on the mechanical bonding between the metal alloy and the ceramic. Newer techniques such as selective laser sintering (SLS) and computer-aided design are fast replacing the lost-wax technique due to ease of fabrication. This study was carried out to ascertain the best possible technique to ensure success. Materials and Methods: Forty strips of cobalt–chromium (Co–Cr) metal were fabricated and divided into two groups (lost-wax technique vs. SLS technology), which were then bonded with ceramic and compared for bond strength and fracture toughness. Results: SLS group showed higher bond strength than conventional lost-wax technique (CAST) group but lowered fracture toughness. This difference was also found to be statistically significant. Conclusion: The lost-wax technique is a time-tested method that needs not be abandoned until successful evolution of emerging technologies is firmly established.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed270    
    Printed33    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded54    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal